Sunday, March 21, 2010

Existentialism and New Thought

Existentialism is similar to New Thought in a few ways. Both emphasize individual passion as a path to true existence, or being. Exercising passion by becoming the person you are creates self-realization, or self actualization. Becoming who you are is important to both.

Becoming the person you are refers to the reality that we have a general fate through our character. We are born with a proto-character that is the foundation for the self-realization that has occurred so far. Our basic genetic character along with decisions that have been made from within that perspective during our lives has produced our "fate" so far.

To some degree we cannot completely escape our fate, since, we cannot act radically different from our basic disposition or personality type. But we do have control over the "style" we create within our overall personality context.

Existentialism is a secular expression of this idea. New Thought is a theistic version. New Thought proposes a relative world beyond the physical, absolute world. We can connect with this presence in our consciousness through regular prayer, silence and meditation. Connecting with the Spirit ensures the expression of the Christ/Buddha/Atman/Brahman within depending on your language/conceptual/traditional preference.

Existentialism supports a virtue ethics that is consistent with Aristotle's ethical system. Nietzsche refers to a Master/Slave dichotomy of ethics, where the Master ethics a self-actualizing virtue system and the Slave system is more constricted, reactionary and limiting. New Thought is similar in that it moves away from limiting language and traditional scriptural interpretations toward a more self-realizing, positive and this-worldly responsibility as opposed to some historical theological perspectives.

Sunday, February 14, 2010

XM Radio

I finally broke down and subscribed to XM Radio because the trial that came with my new car ran out a couple of months ago. It comes in handy on my 25 minute commute to work since dodging advertisements and the other distractions of commercial radio is annoying. It's handy to have a dedicated traffic station for DFW, a wide variety of great music stations and a few more news sources such as CNBC and CNN among others to augment KERA on FM.

But the most fun is choosing from the huge variety of music styles. It's taken at least a couple of weeks to audition several music stations of various styles for presets and I only covered about half of them. The ones I have so far include Real Jazz, Classical, Classic Vinyl, Coffee House, The Groove and a Bluegrass channel.

Classic Vinyl is the album rock from the 60s and 70s. Coffee House is a songwriter channel with an acoustic folk tendency, but also includes covers of big hits done in an unplugged style. The Groove combines classic soul from bands like The Temptations to a variety of Funk, Hip-Hop and danceable tracks with a Funk, Soul or R&B flair. The Bluegrass channel was a random find that is very enjoyable. Fast picking banjos and fiddles full of improvisation is great fun listening.

Auditioning the various music channels reminded me of some styles long forgotten. I do like several of the Country channels, but have not been able to choose one for a preset yet. Outlaw Country features styles like Merle Haggard and others. Willie's Place spins a lot of Willie Nelson and Austin City Limits genres like Asleep at the Wheel. Then there are more mainstream Country-Rock channels.

I have about 3 presets still free after choosing the ones mentioned here plus the 3 news, weather and traffic channels. Maybe I'll toss the smooth jazz slot, Watercolors, that is currently renting a spot but very close to getting booted due to lack of passion. No Kenny G yet, thankfully, but the resemblance to muzak may be too close for comfort.

First Take on the Kindle

I've had a Kindle for a couple of weeks now. So far I have read a couple of articles in PDF form, browsed the Kindle store, chosen some previews of a few best sellers from the store and purchased one book to read on the Kindle.

Learning to use it was a breeze. Scanning the Kindle User Guide, which is provided once the device is registered, was more than enough to understand how to use the basic functions. There was a little confusion when trying to re-size the text on PDFs but that was because you really can't do that.

The PDFs I tried to read displayed in very small typeface - too small to read. The re-size text feature is not provided for PDFs as it is for Kindle books. However, you can rotate the orientation to landscape, causing the PDF to re-size itself to fit the available area. This results in text large enough to read, but very small pages vertically. It was usable though.

Browsing the Kindle book store is easy. You can select books of interest and load a preview to your Kindle. The size of the preview is specific to the book, but the ones I loaded ranged from a very generous preface + two full chapters to as little as part of the first chapter for another.

While I am not a book purist, since I already read a lot of documents on my laptop, online, PDF or Word documents, I wondered what the reading experience on the Kindle might be like. So far, it's different but in a good way.

First, the amount of text displayed on the screen is less than a true book page (at least on the model I have). This is usually a paragraph or two. This can be changed if you go to a different text size, but so far I have stuck with the default as that seems to be fine.

This smaller amount of text seems to make me both read faster and also be happy with only reading short amounts of the book at a time. With a real book, I typically push through to complete at least a chapter at one sitting. With the Kindle, I feel much more satisfied to turn it on, read a few screens for 5-10 minutes or so, then put it away.

For non-fiction, this has the effect of snagging a few ideas in spare minutes rather than pushing for a bigger picture idea of the entire chapter. I am sure this has pluses and minuses, but so far does not seem to negatively affect my ability to discuss and describe what I've read with friends.

The compactness of the Kindle is also attractive, although I have not yet experienced being able to take scores of books on a trip or flight on a single slim, light piece of plastic.

Since it is not back-lit, but uses electronic paper technology, you will need a light to read in bed, which is different from a laptop. The advantage is that the digital ink technology does not use power to keep the screen refreshed, so, once painted, the power consumption is low.

I believe, but do not know yet, that e-book technology will encourage re-reading of at least parts of already consumed books or periodicals, since it is very quick and easy to locate a chapter and read a few ideas to refresh your memory on a particular topic.